How Did the Aaron Hernandez Case Change Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Lawsuits in Personal Injury Litigation? 

The case of Aaron Hernandez, the former NFL star convicted of murder and later diagnosed with severe Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), has profoundly influenced discussions around brain injuries, liability, and legal precedent in personal injury litigation. His posthumous diagnosis raised alarming concerns about the long-term effects of repeated head trauma in contact sports and its legal ramifications. 

How Did Aaron Hernandez’s CTE Diagnosis Change Legal Perspectives? 

Aaron Hernandez’s autopsy revealed Stage 3 CTE, one of the most severe cases ever recorded in someone of his age. This discovery added fuel to ongoing lawsuits against sports organizations, particularly the NFL, for failing to protect players from long-term neurological damage. The Hernandez family later filed a lawsuit against the NFL and the New England Patriots, arguing that the league’s negligence contributed to his cognitive decline and criminal behavior. This case set a precedent influencing both wrongful death claims and TBI-related compensation cases. 

The Rise of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Cases in Personal Injury Law 

With increasing awareness of sports-related TBIs, personal injury and workers’ compensation attorneys have seen a surge in cases involving: 

  • Former athletes suffering from cognitive decline, depression, and violent tendencies linked to CTE. 
  • Workplace injuries, particularly in physically demanding jobs where repeated head trauma is a risk. 
  • Car accidents, where brain injuries often go undiagnosed but significantly impact victims’ lives. 
  • Military-related TBIs, such as the 3M earplug lawsuit, where defective safety equipment contributed to severe brain trauma among service members. 

The Hernandez case brought mainstream attention to the lasting effects of TBIs, prompting courts to take these injuries more seriously and increasing settlement amounts in personal injury lawsuits. 

Legal Challenges in TBI Cases: Proving Causation and Liability 

Despite growing awareness, proving liability in TBI cases remains challenging. Attorneys must establish: 

  1. Causation – Demonstrating that the brain injury was directly caused by negligence (e.g., improper medical care, lack of safety protocols, defective equipment). 
  1. Medical Evidence – Neuroscientific findings, such as MRI scans, neuropsychological tests, and medical chronologies, are crucial in presenting a compelling case. 
  1. Long-Term Impact – Unlike physical injuries, brain injuries often manifest over time, requiring expert testimony to quantify their financial and emotional toll. 

How Trivent Legal Supports TBI-Related Lawsuits 

Trivent Legal assists attorneys handling TBI and CTE-related cases by providing comprehensive medical record reviews and chronologies that streamline case preparation. Our services help personal injury attorneys: 

  • Extract critical medical details from vast volumes of records. 
  • Analyze prior and post-accident medical history to differentiate pre-existing conditions from new injuries. 
  • Compile medical chronologies that create a clear timeline of the injury’s progression and treatment. 
  • Provide detailed deposition summaries to support expert testimonies in court. 

Conclusion 

Aaron Hernandez’s case underscored the importance of detailed medical records, expert medical analysis, and a strategic legal approach when handling TBI cases. If you’re handling a traumatic brain injury lawsuit, Trivent Legal can help by providing precise and structured medical record reviews to strengthen your case. Contact us today to learn how our expertise can support your litigation efforts.

Get your first DepSum AI case free with the promo code: DEPSUM40.
This is default text for notification bar